THE
question of the
covenants has
been greatly
distorted and
misunderstood.
Let’s begin by
noticing what
the old covenant
was not. It was
not the Ten
Commandments.
Why? Because
God’s eternal
law did not grow
old and vanish
away, "In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away." Hebrews 8:13.
They did not
have poor
promises, "But now hath he obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises." Hebrews
8:6,
and they were
not faulty, "For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second."
Hebrews 8:7
What was the old covenant?
Then what was
the old
covenant, and
how was it
ratified? It was
an agreement
between God and
Israel. When
Moses shared the
covenant with
Israel, they
replied, "All
that the Lord
has spoken we
will do." Exodus
19:8. The
people promised
to keep the Ten
Commandments. It
was ratified by
the sprinkled
blood of an ox,
"And he
took the book of
the covenant,
and read in the
audience of the
people: and they
said, All that
the LORD hath
said will we do,
and be obedient. And Moses took
the blood, and
sprinkled on the people,
and said, Behold
the blood of the
covenant, which
the LORD hath
made with you
concerning all
these words." Exodus 24:7,
8. The promises
of the people
failed because
they tried to
obey in their
human strength
alone.
In
comparison, the
new covenant was
instituted and
ratified by the
blood of Jesus
at His death, "And to Jesus
the mediator of
the new
covenant, and to
the blood of
sprinkling, that speaketh better
things than
that of Abel." Hebrews 12:24.
"Now the God
of peace, that
brought again
from the dead
our Lord Jesus,
that great
shepherd of the
sheep, through
the blood of the
everlasting
covenant."
Hebrews 13:20.
"For this is
my blood of the
new testament,
which is shed
for many for the
remission of
sins."
Matthew
26:28. It went
into effect when
He died. "For a
testament
(covenant) is in
force after men
are dead, since
it had no power
at all while the
testator lives." Hebrews 9:17.
After the death
of Christ,
nothing could be
added to or
taken away from
the new
covenant.
In speaking
of the new
covenant, the
apostle Paul
writes: "Though
it is only a
man's covenant,
yet if it is
confirmed, no
one annuls or
adds to it." Galatians
3:15. This
means that after
the death of
Christ, nothing
could be added
to or taken away
from the new
covenant. Jesus
introduced the
Lord's Supper on
Thursday night
before He died,
so it came under
the new covenant.
Matthew 26:28.
Can anything be
"added" after
the death of
Jesus, the testator?
Here's a
question worth
asking: "When
did
Sunday-keeping
begin?" Everyone
answers, "After
the
resurrection."
If that is the
case, then it
cannot be part
of the new
covenant since
it took place
after the death
of Jesus. Can
anything be
“added” after
the death of
Jesus, the
testator?
"For if that
first covenant
had been
faultless, then
should no place
have been sought
for the second."
Hebrews 8:7.
Some
Christians
believe that the
Ten Commandment
law was only a
part of the law
of Moses, which
disappeared with
the old
covenant. These
verses in
Hebrews 10 are
used to support
this premise.
The
"law" of
verse 8 is
undoubtedly
associated with
the "first"
covenant, which
is taken away in
verse 9. But did
that law include
the Ten
Commandments?
Those same
sacrifices and
sin offerings
are described
here in 2
Chronicles,
"Then Solomon
offered burnt
offerings unto
the LORD on the
altar of the
LORD, which he
had built before
the porch, Even
after a certain
rate every day,
offering
according to the
commandment of
Moses, on the
sabbaths, and on
the new moons,
and on the
solemn feasts,
three times in
the year, even
in the feast of
unleavened
bread, and in
the feast of
weeks, and in
the feast of
tabernacles."
2 Chronicles
8:12,13. So you
see here in
these verses
that Solomon
offered burnt offerings
"according to
the commandment
of Moses."
Was the
commandment or
law of Moses
part of the old
covenant that
was taken away?
This makes it
plain that the
law concerning
those burnt
offerings—the
one mentioned in
Hebrews 10:8— was
called the
commandment or
law of Moses. It
was part of the
old covenant
system that was
taken away by "the offering of
the body of
Jesus Christ."
Hebrews 10:10. But
note: The Ten
Commandments
were not part of
that. Christ is
quoted in verse
Hebrews 10:9, "Then said he,
Lo, I come to do
thy will, O God.
He taketh away
the first, that
he may establish
the second."
The full text
of what Christ
said comes from
Psalm 40:8,
which says, "I
delight to do
Your will, O my
God, and Your
law is within my
heart." This law
is tied to the
second (or new)
covenant that
was to be
established.
This is
reinforced a few
verses later in
Hebrews 10,
where it says, "This is the
covenant that I
will make with
them after those
days, says the
Lord: I will put
My laws into
their hearts,
and in their
minds I will
write them."
Hebrews 10:16.
The law that
was in the heart
of Jesus and
which did not
end with the old
covenant is the
Ten Commandment
law. Magnified
by Christ, "The LORD is
well pleased for
his
righteousness'
sake; he will
magnify the law,
and make it
honourable." Isaiah 42:21,
it was
transferred from
the tables of
stone to the
tables of the
heart.
"Above when he
said, Sacrifice
and offering and
burnt offerings
and offering for
sin thou wouldest not,
neither hadst
pleasure
therein; which
are offered by
the law;" Hebrews
10:8.
Has any man been
able to find a
flaw
in the
handwriting of
God?
The Bible says,
"If that first
covenant had
been faultless,
then no place
would have been
sought for a
second." Hebrews
8:7. So let me
ask you: Has any
man been able to
find a flaw in
the handwriting
of God? The
psalmist
declared, "The
law of the Lord
is perfect,
converting the
soul." Psalms
19:7.
Romans 7:12
adds, "The law
is holy, and the
commandment holy
and just and
good." Does that
sound like
something weak
and imperfect?
No law could be
perfect and
faulty at the
same time. It
becomes quite
apparent that
the old covenant
could not have
been the Ten
Commandments
themselves;
instead, the
Commandments
were the terms
of the covenant,
not the actual
covenant.
The new
covenant is the
same law,
but
written by the
Lord on the
human heart.
The word
"covenant" means
agreement—at
fault with this
first agreement
was the promise
of the people,
"All the Lord
has said we will
do." The new
covenant is the
same law, but
written by the
Lord on the
human heart.
"But this
shall be
the covenant
that I will make
with the house
of Israel; After
those days, saith the LORD,
I will put my
law in their
inward parts,
and write it in
their hearts;
and will be
their God, and
they shall be my
people."
Jeremiah
31:33. Notice,
it is the same
law you find in
the Ten
Commandments,
but now it's
written in the
heart. Indeed,
the new covenant
goes even deeper
than the letter
of the law— it
goes to the
spirit of the
law.
Jesus
illustrated this
when He said,
"You have heard
that it was said
to those of old,
'You shall not
murder, and
whoever murders
will be in
danger of the
judgment.' But I
say to you that
whoever is angry
with his brother
without a cause
shall be in
danger of the
judgment." Matthew 5:21,
22.
Jesus taught us
that the new
covenant is not
based on merely
obeying the Ten
Commandments,
but also the
attitude behind
our deeds. The
change of heart
will lead to the
change of life.
"And he declared
unto you his
covenant, which
he commanded you
to perform, even
ten
commandments;
and he wrote
them upon two
tables of stone."
Deuteronomy 4:13
Preparing For Eternity
©1999-2024
All Rights Reserved
Home
Books
Our Beliefs
Site Search
Links
Videos
Contact Us